Review



phospho cdk1 substrate consensus sequence  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc phospho cdk1 substrate consensus sequence
    A FMNL1 schematic ( B ) MSMS scan of residues 1024–1034 (1 experiment). C Representative GFP-FMNL1 IP from cells treated with vehicle ( ~ 2 h DMSO) or adavosertib ( ~ 6.5 h 300 nM). Probed with anti-GFP and <t>anti-phoso-CDK1</t> substrate sequence. Repeated 3X. D Effects of ~4 h adavosertib at 300 nM on wave. Unequal contrasting between groups for ease of viewing. E Effects of CDK1 inhibitors on wave. Asterisk denotes contrast adjustment between conditions, performed as acquisition parameters varied throughout experiment. F CDK1 siRNA treatment. G Effects of adavosertib on wave speed; bars represent means with SEM. Two-sided Student’s t-test. N = 20 and 23 cells across 4 experiments for DMSO and Wee1 inhibitor, respectively. H Effects of CDK1 inhibitors on wave area. CDK1 inhibitors tested in a larger screen; DMSO data run in parallel previously published in Extended figure 8 A of ref. . Analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons was run. n = 151 and 212 cells across 3 experiments for Ro3306 and CGP74 conditions, respectively. I Effects of CDK1 knockdown on wave area. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. n = 60 cells across 3 experiments. J CDK1 knockdown (see Figure ). Means from 3 experiments. K Effects of GFP-FMNL1 WT and S1031A on wave; staining TOMM20 and phalloidin. GFP signal for ‘GFP alone’ condition was differentially scaled. L Wave areas analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn’s multiple comparisons; 40 cells across 4 experiments. M Western blot of GFP-FMNL1 WT and S1031A. N Mean fluorescence: GFP-FMNL1 WT/S1031A. Bars indicate means of triangles, which represent means of 4 biological replicates. O Effects of S1031E on wave; staining for TOMM20 and phalloidin. P Effects on wave area; two-sided Mann-Whitney test, 60 cells across 3 experiments. Q Western of GFP-FMNL1 S1031E. R Mean fluorescence: GFP-FMNL1 WT/S1031E. A – R Scale bars: 10 μm for cell images, 2 μm for insets. For blots, antibody/total protein approximately aligned/scaled the same; kDa, unit of molecular weight. Box plots: center lines indicate medians, plus signs indicate means, error bars = 10–90th percentile. Source data provided. *, **, and *** indicate p -values of < 0.05, ≤ 0.005, and ≤ 0.0005 respectively.
    Phospho Cdk1 Substrate Consensus Sequence, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 159 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/phospho cdk1 substrate consensus sequence/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 159 article reviews
    phospho cdk1 substrate consensus sequence - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "An interphase actin wave promotes mitochondrial content mixing and organelle homeostasis"

    Article Title: An interphase actin wave promotes mitochondrial content mixing and organelle homeostasis

    Journal: Nature Communications

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48189-1

    A FMNL1 schematic ( B ) MSMS scan of residues 1024–1034 (1 experiment). C Representative GFP-FMNL1 IP from cells treated with vehicle ( ~ 2 h DMSO) or adavosertib ( ~ 6.5 h 300 nM). Probed with anti-GFP and anti-phoso-CDK1 substrate sequence. Repeated 3X. D Effects of ~4 h adavosertib at 300 nM on wave. Unequal contrasting between groups for ease of viewing. E Effects of CDK1 inhibitors on wave. Asterisk denotes contrast adjustment between conditions, performed as acquisition parameters varied throughout experiment. F CDK1 siRNA treatment. G Effects of adavosertib on wave speed; bars represent means with SEM. Two-sided Student’s t-test. N = 20 and 23 cells across 4 experiments for DMSO and Wee1 inhibitor, respectively. H Effects of CDK1 inhibitors on wave area. CDK1 inhibitors tested in a larger screen; DMSO data run in parallel previously published in Extended figure 8 A of ref. . Analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons was run. n = 151 and 212 cells across 3 experiments for Ro3306 and CGP74 conditions, respectively. I Effects of CDK1 knockdown on wave area. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. n = 60 cells across 3 experiments. J CDK1 knockdown (see Figure ). Means from 3 experiments. K Effects of GFP-FMNL1 WT and S1031A on wave; staining TOMM20 and phalloidin. GFP signal for ‘GFP alone’ condition was differentially scaled. L Wave areas analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn’s multiple comparisons; 40 cells across 4 experiments. M Western blot of GFP-FMNL1 WT and S1031A. N Mean fluorescence: GFP-FMNL1 WT/S1031A. Bars indicate means of triangles, which represent means of 4 biological replicates. O Effects of S1031E on wave; staining for TOMM20 and phalloidin. P Effects on wave area; two-sided Mann-Whitney test, 60 cells across 3 experiments. Q Western of GFP-FMNL1 S1031E. R Mean fluorescence: GFP-FMNL1 WT/S1031E. A – R Scale bars: 10 μm for cell images, 2 μm for insets. For blots, antibody/total protein approximately aligned/scaled the same; kDa, unit of molecular weight. Box plots: center lines indicate medians, plus signs indicate means, error bars = 10–90th percentile. Source data provided. *, **, and *** indicate p -values of < 0.05, ≤ 0.005, and ≤ 0.0005 respectively.
    Figure Legend Snippet: A FMNL1 schematic ( B ) MSMS scan of residues 1024–1034 (1 experiment). C Representative GFP-FMNL1 IP from cells treated with vehicle ( ~ 2 h DMSO) or adavosertib ( ~ 6.5 h 300 nM). Probed with anti-GFP and anti-phoso-CDK1 substrate sequence. Repeated 3X. D Effects of ~4 h adavosertib at 300 nM on wave. Unequal contrasting between groups for ease of viewing. E Effects of CDK1 inhibitors on wave. Asterisk denotes contrast adjustment between conditions, performed as acquisition parameters varied throughout experiment. F CDK1 siRNA treatment. G Effects of adavosertib on wave speed; bars represent means with SEM. Two-sided Student’s t-test. N = 20 and 23 cells across 4 experiments for DMSO and Wee1 inhibitor, respectively. H Effects of CDK1 inhibitors on wave area. CDK1 inhibitors tested in a larger screen; DMSO data run in parallel previously published in Extended figure 8 A of ref. . Analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons was run. n = 151 and 212 cells across 3 experiments for Ro3306 and CGP74 conditions, respectively. I Effects of CDK1 knockdown on wave area. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. n = 60 cells across 3 experiments. J CDK1 knockdown (see Figure ). Means from 3 experiments. K Effects of GFP-FMNL1 WT and S1031A on wave; staining TOMM20 and phalloidin. GFP signal for ‘GFP alone’ condition was differentially scaled. L Wave areas analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn’s multiple comparisons; 40 cells across 4 experiments. M Western blot of GFP-FMNL1 WT and S1031A. N Mean fluorescence: GFP-FMNL1 WT/S1031A. Bars indicate means of triangles, which represent means of 4 biological replicates. O Effects of S1031E on wave; staining for TOMM20 and phalloidin. P Effects on wave area; two-sided Mann-Whitney test, 60 cells across 3 experiments. Q Western of GFP-FMNL1 S1031E. R Mean fluorescence: GFP-FMNL1 WT/S1031E. A – R Scale bars: 10 μm for cell images, 2 μm for insets. For blots, antibody/total protein approximately aligned/scaled the same; kDa, unit of molecular weight. Box plots: center lines indicate medians, plus signs indicate means, error bars = 10–90th percentile. Source data provided. *, **, and *** indicate p -values of < 0.05, ≤ 0.005, and ≤ 0.0005 respectively.

    Techniques Used: Sequencing, Knockdown, Staining, Western Blot, Fluorescence, MANN-WHITNEY, Molecular Weight



    Similar Products

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc phospho cdk1 substrate consensus sequence
    A FMNL1 schematic ( B ) MSMS scan of residues 1024–1034 (1 experiment). C Representative GFP-FMNL1 IP from cells treated with vehicle ( ~ 2 h DMSO) or adavosertib ( ~ 6.5 h 300 nM). Probed with anti-GFP and <t>anti-phoso-CDK1</t> substrate sequence. Repeated 3X. D Effects of ~4 h adavosertib at 300 nM on wave. Unequal contrasting between groups for ease of viewing. E Effects of CDK1 inhibitors on wave. Asterisk denotes contrast adjustment between conditions, performed as acquisition parameters varied throughout experiment. F CDK1 siRNA treatment. G Effects of adavosertib on wave speed; bars represent means with SEM. Two-sided Student’s t-test. N = 20 and 23 cells across 4 experiments for DMSO and Wee1 inhibitor, respectively. H Effects of CDK1 inhibitors on wave area. CDK1 inhibitors tested in a larger screen; DMSO data run in parallel previously published in Extended figure 8 A of ref. . Analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons was run. n = 151 and 212 cells across 3 experiments for Ro3306 and CGP74 conditions, respectively. I Effects of CDK1 knockdown on wave area. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. n = 60 cells across 3 experiments. J CDK1 knockdown (see Figure ). Means from 3 experiments. K Effects of GFP-FMNL1 WT and S1031A on wave; staining TOMM20 and phalloidin. GFP signal for ‘GFP alone’ condition was differentially scaled. L Wave areas analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn’s multiple comparisons; 40 cells across 4 experiments. M Western blot of GFP-FMNL1 WT and S1031A. N Mean fluorescence: GFP-FMNL1 WT/S1031A. Bars indicate means of triangles, which represent means of 4 biological replicates. O Effects of S1031E on wave; staining for TOMM20 and phalloidin. P Effects on wave area; two-sided Mann-Whitney test, 60 cells across 3 experiments. Q Western of GFP-FMNL1 S1031E. R Mean fluorescence: GFP-FMNL1 WT/S1031E. A – R Scale bars: 10 μm for cell images, 2 μm for insets. For blots, antibody/total protein approximately aligned/scaled the same; kDa, unit of molecular weight. Box plots: center lines indicate medians, plus signs indicate means, error bars = 10–90th percentile. Source data provided. *, **, and *** indicate p -values of < 0.05, ≤ 0.005, and ≤ 0.0005 respectively.
    Phospho Cdk1 Substrate Consensus Sequence, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/phospho cdk1 substrate consensus sequence/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    phospho cdk1 substrate consensus sequence - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    A FMNL1 schematic ( B ) MSMS scan of residues 1024–1034 (1 experiment). C Representative GFP-FMNL1 IP from cells treated with vehicle ( ~ 2 h DMSO) or adavosertib ( ~ 6.5 h 300 nM). Probed with anti-GFP and anti-phoso-CDK1 substrate sequence. Repeated 3X. D Effects of ~4 h adavosertib at 300 nM on wave. Unequal contrasting between groups for ease of viewing. E Effects of CDK1 inhibitors on wave. Asterisk denotes contrast adjustment between conditions, performed as acquisition parameters varied throughout experiment. F CDK1 siRNA treatment. G Effects of adavosertib on wave speed; bars represent means with SEM. Two-sided Student’s t-test. N = 20 and 23 cells across 4 experiments for DMSO and Wee1 inhibitor, respectively. H Effects of CDK1 inhibitors on wave area. CDK1 inhibitors tested in a larger screen; DMSO data run in parallel previously published in Extended figure 8 A of ref. . Analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons was run. n = 151 and 212 cells across 3 experiments for Ro3306 and CGP74 conditions, respectively. I Effects of CDK1 knockdown on wave area. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. n = 60 cells across 3 experiments. J CDK1 knockdown (see Figure ). Means from 3 experiments. K Effects of GFP-FMNL1 WT and S1031A on wave; staining TOMM20 and phalloidin. GFP signal for ‘GFP alone’ condition was differentially scaled. L Wave areas analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn’s multiple comparisons; 40 cells across 4 experiments. M Western blot of GFP-FMNL1 WT and S1031A. N Mean fluorescence: GFP-FMNL1 WT/S1031A. Bars indicate means of triangles, which represent means of 4 biological replicates. O Effects of S1031E on wave; staining for TOMM20 and phalloidin. P Effects on wave area; two-sided Mann-Whitney test, 60 cells across 3 experiments. Q Western of GFP-FMNL1 S1031E. R Mean fluorescence: GFP-FMNL1 WT/S1031E. A – R Scale bars: 10 μm for cell images, 2 μm for insets. For blots, antibody/total protein approximately aligned/scaled the same; kDa, unit of molecular weight. Box plots: center lines indicate medians, plus signs indicate means, error bars = 10–90th percentile. Source data provided. *, **, and *** indicate p -values of < 0.05, ≤ 0.005, and ≤ 0.0005 respectively.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: An interphase actin wave promotes mitochondrial content mixing and organelle homeostasis

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48189-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A FMNL1 schematic ( B ) MSMS scan of residues 1024–1034 (1 experiment). C Representative GFP-FMNL1 IP from cells treated with vehicle ( ~ 2 h DMSO) or adavosertib ( ~ 6.5 h 300 nM). Probed with anti-GFP and anti-phoso-CDK1 substrate sequence. Repeated 3X. D Effects of ~4 h adavosertib at 300 nM on wave. Unequal contrasting between groups for ease of viewing. E Effects of CDK1 inhibitors on wave. Asterisk denotes contrast adjustment between conditions, performed as acquisition parameters varied throughout experiment. F CDK1 siRNA treatment. G Effects of adavosertib on wave speed; bars represent means with SEM. Two-sided Student’s t-test. N = 20 and 23 cells across 4 experiments for DMSO and Wee1 inhibitor, respectively. H Effects of CDK1 inhibitors on wave area. CDK1 inhibitors tested in a larger screen; DMSO data run in parallel previously published in Extended figure 8 A of ref. . Analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons was run. n = 151 and 212 cells across 3 experiments for Ro3306 and CGP74 conditions, respectively. I Effects of CDK1 knockdown on wave area. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. n = 60 cells across 3 experiments. J CDK1 knockdown (see Figure ). Means from 3 experiments. K Effects of GFP-FMNL1 WT and S1031A on wave; staining TOMM20 and phalloidin. GFP signal for ‘GFP alone’ condition was differentially scaled. L Wave areas analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn’s multiple comparisons; 40 cells across 4 experiments. M Western blot of GFP-FMNL1 WT and S1031A. N Mean fluorescence: GFP-FMNL1 WT/S1031A. Bars indicate means of triangles, which represent means of 4 biological replicates. O Effects of S1031E on wave; staining for TOMM20 and phalloidin. P Effects on wave area; two-sided Mann-Whitney test, 60 cells across 3 experiments. Q Western of GFP-FMNL1 S1031E. R Mean fluorescence: GFP-FMNL1 WT/S1031E. A – R Scale bars: 10 μm for cell images, 2 μm for insets. For blots, antibody/total protein approximately aligned/scaled the same; kDa, unit of molecular weight. Box plots: center lines indicate medians, plus signs indicate means, error bars = 10–90th percentile. Source data provided. *, **, and *** indicate p -values of < 0.05, ≤ 0.005, and ≤ 0.0005 respectively.

    Article Snippet: For western blots and immunofluorescence the following primary antibodies were used: TOMM20 (Santa Cruz, sc-17764), FMNL1 (Abcam, ab97456), FMNL2 (Santa Cruz, sc-390298), GFP (abcam, ab1218), GFP (Aves, 1020), phospho-CDK1 substrate consensus sequence (CST, 2325), CDK1 (abcam, ab131450), ARP3 (Proteintech, 13822-1-AP), WHAMM (abcam, ab122572).

    Techniques: Sequencing, Knockdown, Staining, Western Blot, Fluorescence, MANN-WHITNEY, Molecular Weight